Terrorism has long been India’s most persistent security challenge, testing the nation’s resilience through decades of bloodshed. From the shadows of the Parliament attack to the horrors of 26/11, from the tragedy of Pulwama to the outrage of Pahalgam, each assault has only strengthened India’s resolve. The country’s adoption of a zero-tolerance policy against terrorism is not merely a political stance but a survival strategy in a region where Pakistan-sponsored terrorism has become a weapon of war.
India’s approach has evolved from defensive posturing to proactive deterrence. The surgical strikes of 2016, Balakot airstrike of 2019 and the recent OP sindoor marked a paradigm shift in strategic thinking, demonstrating that terrorist safe havens across the border would no longer enjoy impunity. This muscular response was complemented by an equally robust legal and intelligence framework. Security agencies have emerged as a formidable force, dismantling terror networks with surgical precision, while strengthened laws have closed loopholes that terrorists once exploited.
On the international stage, India has successfully transformed its counter-terrorism narrative. Through persistent diplomatic efforts, New Delhi has exposed Pakistan’s role as an incubator of terrorist groups at global forums. The country’s growing security partnerships with major powers, particularly in intelligence-sharing and counter-terror technology, have significantly enhanced its operational capabilities. At home, a multi-pronged approach combines cutting-edge cyber surveillance with community engagement to prevent radicalization at its roots.
The results speak for themselves. In Jammu and Kashmir, once the epicenter of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, security parameters have shown marked improvement post Article-370 abrogation. Terror-related incidents have declined, infrastructure projects have accelerated, and democratic processes have been restored. This progress validates the zero-tolerance approach as not just morally justified but operationally effective.
There can be no negotiation with an ideology that glorifies suicide bombings and targets civilians. India’s experience proves that deterrence, not dialogue, is the only language terrorist sponsors understand. As the country continues to refine its strategy, its message remains clear: terrorism will be met with overwhelming force, its sponsors held accountable, and its ideology given no quarter. In this existential battle, zero tolerance against terrorism is not just a policy, it’s India’s new normal.
